Understanding Christianity
A monthly forum on the third Saturday of each month from 6:30 to 7:30 P.M. following Evening Prayer at 6

Topic Tonight: “Intelligent Design: What Are Its Merits and Its Drawbacks?”
with Dr. Richard T. Nolan
Saturday, February 18, 2006


A CATECHISM OF CREATION [abridged for this topic, RTN, Feb. 2006]

 
Prepared for Study in Congregations by The Committee on Science, Technology and Faith of The Executive Council of The Episcopal Church in the United States of America
 
First Edition, Revised June, 2005
The Catechism of Creation was initially prepared by the Subcommittee on Creation of the Committee on Science, Technology and Faith. An electronic version is available at www.episcopalchurch.org/science/.
 
INTRODUCTION
 
The Catechism of Creation is written in a traditional question-and-answer format, like the “Outline of the Faith, or Catechism” in the Book of Common Prayer. Part I outlines the doctrine of creation, drawing upon the Bible and the theology of the early Church. Part II presents basic information about modern scientific discoveries and theories about the history of the universe and of life. It also gives examples showing how science has informed and inspired a new theological understanding of God’s relationship to the creation. Finally, Part III presents the biblical basis for the church’s commitment to an ethic of caring for creation, and suggests ways in which individuals and congregations might live out this ministry.
 
WHY DO WE BELIEVE THAT GOD IS “MAKER OF HEAVEN AND EARTH ”?
 
1) The Bible declares throughout that God is the creator. In one of many places the Old Testament prophet in Isaiah 44:23 speaks for God: I am the Lord who made all things, Who alone stretched out the heavens, Who by myself spread out the earth. In the New Testament St. Paul (Acts 17:24) refers to the God “who made the world and everything in it, he who is the Lord of heaven and earth….”
 
2) Are the creation stories in Genesis, chapters 1 and 2, meant to convey how God originated the universe?
These majestic stories should not be understood as historical and scientific accounts of origins but as proclamations of basic theological truths about creation. “Creation” in Holy Scripture refers to and describes the relationship between God and all God’s wonderful works.
 
WHAT THEOLOGICAL TRUTHS ABOUT CREATION DOES GENESIS 1 CONVEY?
 
Genesis 1 teaches that the one true God calls the universe into existence, and all of creation responds to God’s call. The creation has order and structure. It is transfigured and reveals God’s presence, yet it is natural, not divine. It is dependent upon its Creator for its continuing existence and for all of the powers and capacities it possesses. Each element is declared to be good and the whole of it very good. Finally, Genesis 1 teaches that the Sabbath, God’s holy day of celebration and rest, is anchored in the act of creation.
 
WHAT TRUTHS ABOUT CREATION DOES GENESIS 2 DECLARE?
 
While Genesis 1 emphasizes God’s [independence and holiness]. Genesis 2, in poetic and metaphorical language, emphasizes God’s intimate relationship with creation. In the story of the making of the garden and of the first man and woman, God is present to every creature in creating it and giving it sustenance.
 
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REVEAL ABOUT GOD’S RELATIONSHIP TO HUMANITY?
 
Genesis 1:26-28 teaches that God brought forth man and woman in the divine image and likeness, enabling them to enter into an intimate relationship with God and one another. And God gave humankind the responsibility to tend and serve the garden (Gen. 2:6), i.e., to care for “this fragile earth, our island home” (Eucharistic Prayer C). God also has given human beings creative powers. We also participate in creation through works of human thought, art and scientific invention (cf. Ex. 31:35). God invites humanity into a covenantal relationship of love for God, for all humankind and for the whole creation.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT GOD CONTINUES TO CREATE?
 
It means that God continually calls forth, dwells in, preserves, directs, and provides for creation.
 
Part II: Creation and Science
 
DOES THE BIBLE TEACH SCIENCE? DO WE FIND SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE IN THE BIBLE?
 
Episcopalians believe that the Bible “contains all things necessary to salvation” (Book of Common Prayer, p. 868): it is the inspired and authoritative source of truth about God, Christ, and the Christian life. But physicist and priest John Polkinghorne, following sixteenth-century Anglican theologian Richard Hooker, reminds us Anglicans and Episcopalians that the Bible does not contain all necessary truths about everything else. The Bible, including Genesis, is not a divinely dictated scientific textbook. We discover scientific knowledge about God’s universe in nature not Scripture.
 
HOW ARE WE TO TREAT CONCEPTS IN THE BIBLE THAT APPEAR TO BE SCIENTIFIC?
 
Theologians throughout the history of the Church have explained these concepts this way: God inspired the ancient writers to describe the world in concepts and language they and their audiences could understand, not in our concepts and language. The ancient world-picture—a “three-storied” creation of the heavens above, the earth beneath, and the waters under the earth (Exodus 20:4)--though meaningful in its own time, was replaced by succeeding models and most recently by our modern portrait of a vast universe with billions of galaxies. The Bible’s theological declarations about God and creation remain true because they are not dependent upon the ancient world-picture in which they appear.
 
ARE NOT SCIENCE AND THE BIBLE IN CONFLICT WITH ONE ANOTHER, AS MANY CHRISTIANS BELIEVE?
 
Both some non-believers and some Christians promote this Conflict approach. The former group claims that the universe is all there is and therefore the concept of God is outdated and irrelevant. Some conservative Christians perceive modern scientific theories to be hostile to their Christian faith and reject them as contrary to their beliefs about the Bible. There is a middle way, which some call a Complementary approach. Its supporters say that while they are separate fields of study with different sources of knowledge, science and Christian theology can complement one another in the quest for truth and understanding. Together they can create a more complete understanding of and give greater meaning to our world.
 
WHAT ARE THE MAJOR FEATURES OF OUR CONTEMPORARY COSMOLOGY?
 
Scientific evidence shows that we live in a universe so enormous that it is difficult for the human mind to grasp. This universe has no “up” or “down,” no center and no edge. It has been expanding for about 14 billion years from an event called the “Big Bang.” From that singular event, space and time and various forms of matter and energy have emerged. Billions of galaxies each made up of billions of stars and countless numbers of planets have come into existence. Scientists still seek to understand many mysterious features of the universe.
 
IS IT PROPER TO SPEAK OF AN EVOLVING CREATION?
 
Yes. When astronomers look out into space they look back in time. Thus, they are able to see our universe at many stages of cosmic evolution since its beginning in the Big Bang. Here on earth biologists, paleontologists, geneticists and other scientists are showing that life has evolved for nearly four billion years, and are reconstructing evolution’s history. None of these scientific discoveries and the theories that explain them stands in conflict with what the Bible reveals about God’s relationship to the creation.
 
ISN’T EVOLUTION JUST A THEORY?
 
Theories are not mere guesses or hypotheses, as people often suppose. When enough evidence supports a hypothesis that has been created to explain some facts of nature, it becomes a theory. A theory is a well-established concept that is confirmed by further scientific discoveries and is able to predict new discoveries. The Big Bang theory and cosmic evolution are confirmed by discoveries in physics ranging from the smallest known particles of matter to the processes by which galaxies are formed. Biological evolution is a web of theories strongly supported by scientific observations and experiments. It fits in with what we know about the physical evolution of the universe, and has been confirmed by evidence gathered from the remains of extinct species and from the forms and environments of living species.
 
WHAT IS BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION?
 
Biological evolution means that living things change over time. A great variety and diversity of organisms have come into existence over the past four billion years from one or a few original life forms. All living things—bacteria, archaebacteria, protists, fungi, plants and animals, including human beings—are descendants of pre-existing life forms, most of which are extinct. The evidence for evolution shows that all life on earth is related and interconnected, and is often depicted as a great “Tree of Life.” Evolution happens gradually, sometimes at a rapid rate and sometimes slowly, but never with discontinuities. Evolution happens because of natural selection, that is, some features of organisms lead to higher survival rates in their environments than others. Charles Darwin was the first to bring together all these ideas. Scientific researchers since Darwin have refined and added to them, but never thrown out his basic theoretical framework.
 
WHAT EVIDENCE HAS NATURE PROVIDED TO SUPPORT BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION?
 
1) There are three major areas of evidence: the fossil record, biogeography, and genetics. Fossils of hundreds of thousands of now extinct species show that life has evolved from simpler to more complex forms over millions of years. Thousands of transitional fossils help us to understand how the changes took place. Scientists use techniques based on the rate at which radioactive elements decay to date fossils and the rock layers in which they are found. In this way layers of fossils from one part of the world can be related to fossils 11 of a similar age from another continent. These studies, combined with comparing the structures of various fossilized creatures, provide evidence for the relationships over time among living things.
 
2) While paleontologists study fossils and their relationships over time, biogeographers study the relationships and changes in species from one place to another. The distribution of species provides clues to how they evolved. For centuries naturalists have noted that similar creatures living in separate locations show differences in appearance and behavior, particularly when they do not interbreed. The unique plants and animals of islands have provided some of the most dramatic examples of evolution. The finches of the Galapagos Islands that inspired Darwin are one famous example. Studies in genetics provide the third major field of evidence. Genes carry instructions for making proteins, basic to all life. An analogy to language is helpful in explaining how genetics helps us understand evolution. Genes speak a universal language using only four chemical letters. The structure of the DNA molecule, which carries the genes, is identical in all life; that is, it uses the same grammar. But the arrangement and number of genes varies widely among species. Thus each species has its own evolutionary story. Individuals have different versions of that story. Similarities and differences in genetic make-up, then, help scientists identify how closely or distantly related individuals and species are.
 
Beginning in the twentieth century, genetic research has added tremendously to the knowledge gained from fossils and biogeography. Together they show the astonishing diversity of life to be evolved, not a series of separate acts of creation.
 
WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE THAT HUMAN BEINGS ARE ALSO EVOLVED CREATURES?
 
Fossil discoveries show that human beings and monkeys, chimpanzees, and other primates can trace their lineage to a common ancestor living seven millions years ago. We humans share almost identical DNA and key protein molecules with chimpanzees. We also are the most recent descendents of a line of hominid creatures now extinct. The earliest fossils of our human-like ancestors are about 6.7 million years old. The first modern humans appeared 100,000 and 200,000 years ago.
 
DOES THIS PICTURE OF HUMAN EVOLUTION CONFLICT WITH THE BIBLICAL STATEMENT THAT WE HUMANS ARE MADE IN THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF GOD?
 
In Genesis, “image of God” is a theological notion. It refers to our ability to enter into an intimate relationship and communion with God, other human beings and the whole of creation. Theologians have interpreted it to refer also to those divine gifts of unconditional love and compassion, our intellectual and moral reasoning and imagination, our freedom, or our creativity. To think that these gifts may have been bestowed through the evolutionary process does not conflict with biblical and theological notions that God acts in creation.
 
HAS THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH SPOKEN OFFICIALLY ON EVOLUTION?
 
No. However, clergy and scientists from both the Catholic and Evangelical traditions in Anglicanism have accepted evolution from Darwin’s time to the present. In a resolution passed by General Convention in 1982, the Church affirmed the ability of God to create in any form and fashion, which would include evolution. Several Anglicans and Episcopalians, some of whom are both theologians and scientists, are contributing to the development of new theologies of an evolving creation.
 
WHAT ARE THEOLOGIANS SAYING ABOUT GOD’S CREATING ACTIVITIES IN LIGHT OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES AND THEORIES?
 
1) While theologians have proposed different models of how God acts in an evolving world, they agree that God is best understood as interacting with the world rather than intervening in it—a God intimately present in the world (as Scripture also reveals) rather than a God “out there.” According to Anglican priest and biologist Arthur Peacocke, God acts as Creator “in, with and under” the natural processes of chance and natural selection. Theologian Elizabeth Johnson writes that God uses random genetic mutations to ensure variety, resilience, novelty and freedom in the world. At the same time, the universe operates by certain natural laws or “secondary causes” by which God, the Primary Cause, ensures regularity and reliability in nature. Physicist Howard J. Van Till has written that God has creatively and generously given the creation all of the powers and capacities “in the beginning” that enable it to organize and transform itself into the variety of atoms, molecules, chemical elements, galaxies, stars, and planets in the universe, and species of living things on this earth.
 
2) In this evolving universe, God does not dictate the outcome of nature’s activities, but allows the world to become what it is able to become in all of its diversity: one could say that God has a purpose rather than a fixed plan, a goal rather than a blueprint. As the nineteenth-century Anglican minister Charles Kingsley put it, God has made a world that is able to make itself. Polkinghorne states that God has given the world a free process, just as God has given human beings free choice. Divine Love (1 John 4:8) frees the universe and life to develop as they are able to by using all of their divinely given powers and capacities. The universe, as Augustine of Hippo said, is “God’s love song.” Because God’s Love is poured out within the creation, theologian Denis Edwards asserts that “the Trinitarian God is present to every creature in its being and becoming.” These are but some of the concepts that contemporary theologians are offering to account for God’s relationship to an evolving creation.
 
HOW DO THESE THEOLOGICAL MODELS OF GOD’S RELATIONSHIP SQUARE WITH THE BELIEF THAT GOD’S SOVEREIGN POWER CONTROLS THE UNIVERSE?
 
Knowing the creation as evolving also helps us to think of God’s relationship to the cosmos in another way. In Phil. 2:5-11, Christ is said to “empty himself” of divinity and take in human form the role of a servant. The Greek word for emptying is kenosis. A kenotic theology of creation expresses the notion that the Triune God freely and 13 graciously withdraws absolute power in order to “let the world be” (Genesis 1). A loving parent is faithful to her child, guides and protects him, but allows him to become his own self. In a comparable but more profound way, God the Divine Lover loves God’s own creation, faithfully holding it in existence, calling it to greater levels of complexity and beauty, but allowing the physical laws that govern the galaxies, and those of chance, environment, and selection that govern life, to take cosmic and biotic evolution in whatever directions the gifts given to creation permit. God’s kenosis gives the universe its freedom and opens up its future; God’s covenantal faithfulness and natural laws ensure its cohesion and regularity.
 
IF EVOLUTION IS SAID TO HAVE TAKEN BILLIONS OF YEARS, HOW IS THIS CONSISTENT WITH THE BIBLICAL SIX DAYS OF CREATION?
 
Early Church theologians like Basil of Caesarea (330-379 AD) and Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD) said that the six days should not be understood as scientific chronology. Rather, they provide a literary framework that the inspired writer used to organize and present the various elements of the creation. They express a topical not a temporal order. Most biblical scholars now recognize that the six days also perform an important symbolic function: they convey that the commandment for a Sabbath day of rest was established at the very beginning of creation.
 
WHY ARE MANY CHRISTIANS OPPOSED AND HOSTILE TO EVOLUTION?
 
Many Christians have been taught to believe that evolution is opposed to creation, and that a believer cannot accept evolution and also believe in God. Neither of these assertions is true. Two alternatives to biological evolution put forth by some Christians are called “Young Earth Creationism” and “Intelligent Design.”
 
WHAT IS “INTELLIGENT DESIGN”?
 
The proponents of the Intelligent Design Movement assert that it is possible to discern scientifically the actions of God in nature. They claim that certain features of living organisms are “irreducibly complex,” too complex to believe that they could ever have developed through biological evolution. Therefore, they can be accounted for only by the direct action of an Intelligent Designer. Most advocates oppose biological evolution, which they equate with what they call “Naturalism.” They define “Naturalism” as a philosophical belief system that claims that nature is all that exists, and therefore there is no God who acts in nature. To scientists, however, “naturalism” has a far different meaning: they seek to study and understand nature using methods that make no claims either for or against the existence of God.”
 
{RTN: Discuss “theological naturalism.”} “Theological naturalism” is “the view that a rational conception of God is not only consistent with, but an integral part of, the natural world” according to the entry “Philosophy of Religion” in A. Pablo Iannone, Dictionary of World Philosophy (London and New York: Routledge, 2001), p. 435. For theistic naturalists God is compatible with complex, vast natural existence and not ontologically "wholly other" (super-natural). This view is harmonious with ancient Hebrew (biblical) conceptions of the personal Creator.
 
"Theistic naturalism" or "naturalistic theism" is noted in the following publications: David Ray Griffin, Religion and Scientific Naturalism: Overcoming the Conflicts (Albany, N.Y.: SUNY, 2000); David Ray Griffin, Reinchantment Without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion (Ithaca and London: Cornell, 2001); Randolph C. Miller, The American Spirit In Theology (Philadelphia: United Church Press, 1974); Randolph C. Miller, ed., Theologies of Religious Education (Alabama: Religious Education Press, 1995); Harold H. Titus, Living Issues in Philosophy (New York: American Book Co., 1946); and, Henry N. Wieman and Bernard E. Meland, American Philosophies and Religions (New York: Willett, Clark & Co., 1936). The term is also found within “Naturalism” in the Encyclopaedia Britannica (2001 Deluxe Edition CD and at www.britannica.com). Additionally, similar classifications may be found within papers of the Conference on Naturalism, Theism, and the Scientific Enterprise, University of Texas, 1997) at http://www.leaderu.com/offices/koons/menus/conference.html.
 
HOW HAVE THE SCIENTIFIC AND THEOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES RESPONDED TO THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN MOVEMENT?
 
A few within the scientific community are persuaded by the arguments of Intelligent Design advocates, particularly by their writings on the various levels of complexity in organisms. Many Christians accept their arguments because they believe they confirm their faith in a creating God. However, the great majority of scientists agree that “Intelligent Design” advocates have not produced valid scientific research and evidence to back up their claims. Christian critics reject the notion that God should or can be brought in as a part of scientific explanation. The “Intelligent Design” argument implies that God has to step in from time to time to keep creative processes going because living things lack powers and capacities God did not give the universe earlier. Many critics assert that Intelligent Design advocates fail to distinguish between “evolutionism” as a philosophy and “evolution” as a science with a web of theories based upon a great deal of scientific evidence.
 
HAS THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH SPOKEN OFFICIALLY ON THE CLAIMS OF THE INTELLIGENT DESIGN MOVEMENT?
 
No. Although some Episcopalians are attracted to this concept, many Anglicans and Episcopalians who are scientists oppose the Intelligent Design Movement for the same reasons the vast majority of other scientists do. They also reject the way Intelligent Design advocates meld together and confuse science and theology. Nature and Scripture present different kinds of truths about creation. It is not science’s task to discover God in Nature; it is theology’s task to proclaim the revelation of the creating God in Scripture.
 
WHY CANNOT ONE SPEAK OF GOD’S CREATION AS THE WORK OF A DESIGNER WHO MANIFESTS INTELLIGENCE IN THE FEATURES OBSERVED IN THE UNIVERSE?
 
One can maintain that God’s creation shows design without agreeing with the arguments of the Intelligent Design Movement. Instead of implying a “Designer God” who from time to time intervenes in the creation, one may speak of a Creator who has built capabilities and processes for design into the very structure of the universe from its beginning. For example, many scientists have noted a remarkable set of coincidences in the values of the forces that hold atoms, molecules, stars and galaxies together. If any of these values were different by even the tiniest amount, our universe and life could not exist. These facts give Christians reasons to believe that we live in a created universe that has been given the capacities for design. But, this is a theological conclusion based upon an interpretation of scientific data and not a scientific argument for the existence of a Designer.
 
IF NEW SPECIES ARISE THROUGH EVOLUTION, THEN WHY DO CREATURES EXHIBIT FEATURES THAT LOOK LIKE THEY ARE DESIGNED?
 
Theologians once argued that the structures of the heavens and the designs of living creatures provide evidences for the existence of God. We now know that the structures of matter and living things are actually the outcome of evolutionary processes. Design in living organisms is now understood to be an internal rather than an external process, their forms arising within the creatures themselves rather than being imposed from without. Theologically speaking, we can understand the powers and capacities in nature that produce evolving and emerging design in creatures as a sign of the giftedness of creation, and give glory to God for it.
 
IF GOD CREATES THROUGH EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES, HOW MAY THIS AWARENESS ENHANCE MY SPIRITUAL LIFE?
 
The God of evolution is the biblical God, subtle and gracious, who interacts with and rejoices in the enormous variety, diversity, and beauty of this evolving creation. When we contemplate the tremendous gift of freedom God has bestowed upon the creation, and how the Holy Spirit preserves in covenantal faithfulness the physical laws, powers and processes that enable such variety and beauty, these thoughts may move our hearts to a deeper admiration, awe and gratitude for God’s works. They may inspire a curiosity to know God’s creation more deeply, celebrate it with thanksgiving, and devote ourselves to caring for it.
 
[See also “Science and Philosophy” in LIVING ISSUES IN PHILOSOPHY (Oxford, 1995). Access www.philosophy-religion.org/. Click “textbooks” subsite. Click “other.” Insert password P1010. Click “click here to continue.” Access “Science and Philosophy” chapter in the index.]
 
THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT
 
The teleological argument, or the argument from design or purpose in the world, is among the most popular of the theistic arguments. The order and the progress in the universe disclose an immanent intelligence and purpose. Take, for example, the long process of development leading to the human brain and mind. The process has produced minds that begin to understand the world, and it has produced thought and understanding. How could this occur unless the course of evolution were directed by an infinite mind?
 
The teleological argument was elaborated by William Paley (1743–1805). He argued, for example, that the human eye must represent an intelligent creator’s design; it would be absurd to attribute the biological development of the eye to “chance.” Paley’s analogy of the watch conveys the argument well: I may explain the existence of a rock lying on the ground by references to natural forces such as volcanic action, wind, and rain. However, if I see a watch lying on the ground, I cannot explain its existence in the same way; the complex arrangement of the watch’s wheels, springs, and other parts, all operating together accurately, requires the postulate of an intelligent mind responsible for its being. Paley argued for the existence of God based on the complex and orderly functioning of the world; there must be a Creator just as there must be a watchmaker.
 
Criticisms of the Argument.
 
The teleological argument has had many able supporters who argue from the presence of order and design in the world to the source of that order in a purposeful God. Kant pointed out that at most the argument from design points to a designer who is not necessarily an omnipotent creator of the world. Other critics have thought that the Darwinian doctrine of natural selection has weakened the force of the teleological argument. Another more severe criticism is that the argument assumes an order and design. The position can be offered that there is disorder, chance, or even chaos; human perceptions of reality are generally unaware of fundamental disorder in the universe.
 
from Living Issues in Philosophy (9th ed., Oxford)
 
Cicero made one of the earliest teleological arguments. He was writing from the cultural background of the Roman religion. In Roman mythology the creator goddess, Gaia was borrowed from Greek mythology. The Romans called her Tellus or Terra.
 
When you see a sundial or a water-clock, you see that it tells the time by design and not by chance. How then can you imagine that the universe as a whole is devoid of purpose and intelligence, when it embraces everything, including these artifacts themselves and their artificers? (Gjertsen 1989, p. 199, quoted by Dennett 1995, p. 29)
 
A version of the teleological argument was the fifth of Thomas Aquinas' five proofs for the existence of God in his Summa Theologiae (or Theologica):
 
"The fifth way is taken from the governance of the world. We see that things which lack knowledge, such as natural bodies, act for an end, and this is evident from their acting always, or nearly always, in the same way, so as to obtain the best result. Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously, but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore, some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God." [1]
 
“Teleological argument”
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GENESIS 1:1 – 2:3 The First Creation Story [read tonight in the Service]
 
1In the beginning when God created the heavens and the earth, 2the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God swept over the face of the waters. 3Then God said, ‘Let there be light’; and there was light. 4And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. 5God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

6 And God said, ‘Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.’ 7So God made the dome and separated the waters that were under the dome from the waters that were above the dome. And it was so. 8God called the dome Sky. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.

9 And God said, ‘Let the waters under the sky be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.’ And it was so. 10God called the dry land Earth, and the waters that were gathered together he called Seas. And God saw that it was good. 11Then God said, ‘Let the earth put forth vegetation: plants yielding seed, and fruit trees of every kind on earth that bear fruit with the seed in it.’ And it was so. 12The earth brought forth vegetation: plants yielding seed of every kind, and trees of every kind bearing fruit with the seed in it. And God saw that it was good. 13And there was evening and there was morning, the third day.

14And God said, ‘Let there be lights in the dome of the sky to separate the day from the night; and let them be for signs and for seasons and for days and years, 15and let them be lights in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth.’ And it was so. 16God made the two great lights—the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night—and the stars. 17God set them in the dome of the sky to give light upon the earth, 18to rule over the day and over the night, and to separate the light from the darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day.

20And God said, ‘Let the waters bring forth swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the dome of the sky.’ 21So God created the great sea monsters and every living creature that moves, of every kind, with which the waters swarm, and every winged bird of every kind. And God saw that it was good. 22God blessed them, saying, ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.’ 23And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.

24And God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth living creatures of every kind: cattle and creeping things and wild animals of the earth of every kind.’ And it was so. 25God made the wild animals of the earth of every kind, and the cattle of every kind, and everything that creeps upon the ground of every kind. And God saw that it was good.

26Then God said, ‘Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the wild animals of the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.’
27So God created humankind in his image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
28God blessed them, and God said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth.’ 29God said, ‘See, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit; you shall have them for food. 30And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.’ And it was so.31God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all their multitude. 2And on the seventh day God finished the work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all the work that he had done. 3So God blessed the seventh day and hallowed it, because on it God rested from all the work that he had done in creation. 4aThese are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created.
[It may be that verse 4a belongs with the Second Creation story as its introduction; scholars uncertain.]
Genesis 2: 4a-25 The Second Creation Story (the older of the two)
4bIn the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens, 5when no plant of the field was yet in the earth and no herb of the field had yet sprung up—for the Lord God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was no one to till the ground; 6but a stream would rise from the earth, and water the whole face of the ground— 7then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground,* and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being. 8And the Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 9Out of the ground the Lord God made to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food, the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

10A river flows out of Eden to water the garden, and from there it divides and becomes four branches. 11The name of the first is Pishon; it is the one that flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; 12and the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. 13The name of the second river is Gihon; it is the one that flows around the whole land of Cush. 14The name of the third river is Tigris, which flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.

15The Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to till it and keep it. 16And the Lord God commanded the man, ‘You may freely eat of every tree of the garden; 17but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die.’

18Then the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner.’ 19So out of the ground the Lord God formed every animal of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to the man to see what he would call them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20The man gave names to all cattle, and to the birds of the air, and to every animal of the field; but for the man* there was not found a helper as his partner. 21So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and he slept; then he took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. 22And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. 23Then the man said,
‘ This at last is bone of my bones
and flesh of my flesh;
this one shall be called Woman,*
for out of Man* this one was taken.’
24Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and clings to his wife, and they become one flesh. 25And the man and his wife were both naked, and were not ashamed.

 
Methods of Bible Study
 
     When individuals are examined for ordination in The Episcopal Church, what methods of studying the Bible are they expected to utilize? “Current biblical scholarship ... is concerned to determine the given literary genre of a biblical book or most often a given section of it (form criticism). Further, it may be possible to discover how this genre was handed down (transmission history), and came to be incorporated by a collector or editor (redaction criticism) into a continuous narrative, and ultimately became part of a written document (literary criticism). The methods do not exclude one another; in fact, they are mutually complementary. But they are not merely methods; they are not intellectual exercises for an elite. Every perceptive reader of the Bible can profit from the several approaches. ...readers will find Bible reading more challenging, as well as more informative, if they study the text along these lines.” [from the Summary in “Modern Approaches to Biblical Study,” The New Oxford Annotated Bible (1991), pp. 391 and 392] Moreover, candidates for ordination, other laypersons, and clergy may rely on current Bible commentaries and annotations to the biblical texts prepared by specialists in the relevant languages, history, and other analytical resources. After the study of a passage is completed (its historical and literary context probed), one may then reflect on an informed meaning of the text for one’s life and prayers, or perhaps prepare a sermon.
 
     Faithful and informed Episcopalians do not read the Holy Scriptures simplistically and entirely as literal history, science, or as a series of absolute mandates for behavior. The Episcopal Church is not a fundamentalist Church “that affirms the absolute and unerring authority of the Bible, rules out a scientific or critical [i.e., analytical] study of the scriptures, denies the theory of evolution, and holds that alternate religious views within Christianity or outside are false.” [from “Fundamentalism,” The HarperCollins Dictionary of Religion (1995), p. 369] In addition to the conscientious study of the Bible, Episcopalians also draw upon reason, tradition, and the ongoing corporate experience of the Church as we “continue to grow in His love and service.”
 
     Upholding Scripture as primary and honoring tradition, the Anglican Way is for individuals to reason carefully, proceed prayerfully, and agree to differ - all within a community of faith that continually evolves in doctrinal and moral wisdom. A perennial difficulty for some lay and ordained communicants is an unwillingness to respect - and even celebrate - informed, diverse understandings of the Anglican/Episcopal heritage. For committed Episcopalians, fundamental unity is experienced not in intellectual agreement, but in our common Baptism and corporate acts of worship, particularly the Holy Eucharist.
 
From HARPER’S BIBLE COMMENTARY

1:1-11:32 The Beginnings

 
     The narrative of Genesis 1-11 begins with the creation of the good world and of humanity as its blessed resident and regent. The divine intention was frustrated by human evil, however, in a story of progressive deterioration and alienation: from the primal act of disobedience (chap. 3) to another act of hubris (chap. 11) in which the boundaries that separate the divine and human worlds are challenged. Since Genesis 1 showed creation to be a process of separation and distinction, the ignoring or blurring of these distinctions reverses the very process of creation and brings about the return to chaos in the Flood.
 
     The growth and spread of sin from disobedience (chap. 3) to murder (chap. 4) to total corruption (chap. 6) to universal destruction (chaps. 7-8) show humanity under the curse as the consequence of sin. But there is a parallel history of divine blessing and grace as well, a history that begins with the creation of a blessed humanity, wherein God continues to show his care for his sinful creatures and in which is renewed the blessing of all humanity (in chap. 9) and of a particular family (in chap. 12), which will become a source of blessing for all.
 
1:1-2:24 The Two Creation Accounts
 
1:1-2, In the Beginning.
     As most modern translations recognize, the P creation account (1:1-2:4a) begins with a temporal clause (“When, in the beginning, God created”); such a translation puts Gen. 1:1 in agreement with the opening of the J account (2:4b) and with other ancient, Near Eastern creation myths. The Hebrew verb bara’, “create,” is used exclusively of divine activity; “heavens and earth” are a merism (an expression of totality by the use of two polar expressions) meaning “everything” (--> Creation).
 
     The description of the precreation state in v. 2 probably is meant to suggest a storm-tossed sea: darkness, a great wind, the watery abyss. God’s superiority over the sea here and in vv. 9-10 may be a reminiscence of the ancient Near Eastern mythic portrait of creation as the victory of order over hostile, chaotic forces like the divinized sea (--> Polytheism; Sea). The tripartite form and downward movement from “heaven” to “earth” to “sea” is frequent elsewhere in the OT (e.g., Pss. 135:6; 146:6; Amos 9:6).
 
1:3-31, The Six Days of Creation.
 
     The six days of P’s creation week are described in solemn, repetitive language and are arranged in two sets of three, in which days 1 and 4 correspond, as do days 2 and 5, and 3 and 6. The first three days describe the divine work of separation (light from darkness, water above from water below, sea from land) that prepares a habitable world, while the last three days describe the inhabitants. Day 1 describes the creation of light, and day 4 the sources of light (sun, moon, stars); in day 2 the creation of the dome of the sky (“firmament” in the older translations) provides an air space and waters for the creatures of day 5, fish and birds; in day 3, dry land and plants are provided for the land animals and human beings of day 6 (--> Firmament).
 
     The climax of the six days of creation is the creation of humankind on day 6, which differs from the other days in God’s prior consultation of the heavenly court, Israel’s demythologized version of the ancient Near Eastern pantheon (v. 26: “Let us make humanity”; cf. Isa. 6:8) and in the designation of humanity as the image of God (--> Image of God). The context suggests that humanity is the image of God in the dominion it exercises over the rest of creation; ancient Near Eastern parallels suggest that “image of God” is a royal designation, emphasizing the godlike nature of the ruling monarch. In the imageless religious tradition of Israel, the only acceptable image of God is the human being.
 
     The divine command to humanity in v. 28 to reproduce prepares for the Genesis genealogies, the continuation of God’s initial act of creation, and reaches its climax in the fruitfulness of Israel in Egypt (Exod. 1:7, 12).
 
2:1-4a, The Divine Sabbath.
 
     The P week of creation closes with God’s resting on the seventh day and his blessing that day, which will be the Israelite Sabbath (Exod. 20:8-11). The language here is remarkably similar to that found at the end of the account of the construction of the desert tabernacle in Exod. 39:32, 42-43; 40:33 (--> Tabernacle). The creation stories of the ancient Near East often conclude with the construction of a dwelling for the victorious deity. In the Israelite use of this motif, human beings participate in the divine work of creation by extending and completing it. While most scholars consider 2:4a to be the end of the P creation account, echoing 1:1, some understand it rather as the heading of the second creation account.
 
2:4b-24, The Second Creation Account.
 
     Like P, the J creation account begins with a temporal clause, this time one that describes the precreation state as a waterless, lifeless desert. There may be echoes here of the Canaanite myth of Baal’s struggle with a demonic adversary Mot (Death), as there are similar reminiscences of the combat myth of the creator-god Baal versus the Sea in 1:1-2 (--> Baal). The Israelite adaptation and reuse of the Canaanite myths of Baal versus the Sea in Genesis 1 and of Baal versus Death in his desert domain in Genesis 2 recall Yahweh’s victory over the sea (Exod. 14-15) and the desert (Exod. 16-17) in the creation of Israel.
 
     The water from the earth transforms the desert into a garden filled with the bounty of the earth; in the center of the garden stand the tree of life, a common ancient Near Eastern motif, and the tree of knowledge ( ---> Tree of Life, The).
 
     Yahweh’s first act of creation in J is the creation of a man from the clay produced by the mixture of the water and dry earth of Gen. 2:6, enlivened by the divine breath (--> Adam; Adamah; Flesh and Spirit). The man’s responsibility in Eden, whose abundance comes from Yahweh and not from any of the fertility gods of polytheism, is to cultivate the garden and to obey the divine prohibition of eating from the tree of knowledge (--> Eden). The naming of the animals by the human being (vv. 19-20) is J’s way of indicating human dominion over the created world (as in 1:28-30); it recalls the divine name giving in Genesis 1.
 
     The J creation account reaches its climax in the creation of woman as a helping counterpart to the man; the creation of woman from man does not imply subordination, any more than the creation of the man from the earth implies subordination. The subordination of woman to man is effected by the frustration of the divine intention of equality.
 

chap. = chapter
chaps. = chapters
v. = verse
vv. = verses
OT = Old Testament