SAINT ANDREW’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Lake Worth, Florida

 

FORUM - UNDERSTANDING CHRISTIANITY

June 15, 2002

 

“CURRENT SCANDALS IN CHRISTIAN CHURCHES” – Canon Richard T. Nolan

 

 

A. WHAT IS A “SCANDAL?”

 

Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin scandalum stumbling block, offense, from Greek skandalon trap, stumbling block, offense; akin to Latin scandere to climb

Date: 13th century
1a: discredit brought upon religion by unseemly conduct in a religious person

  b: conduct that causes or encourages a lapse of faith or of religious obedience in another
2:    loss of or damage to reputation caused by actual or apparent violation of morality or propriety
3a: a circumstance or action that offends propriety or established moral conceptions or disgraces those associated with it

  b: a person whose conduct offends propriety or morality
4: malicious or defamatory gossip
5: indignation, chagrin, or bewilderment brought about by a flagrant violation of morality, propriety, or religious opinion

 

B. A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR

 

      Failure to hold church leaders (lay and ordained) accountable in effective ways. The next two paragraphs are excerpts from “Accountability of Rectors” within “Constructive Criticisms…..” at www.philosophy-religion.org/.

 

Lack of Effective Evaluations

Little impetus is evident for the development and implementation of truly effective methods for holding rectors accountable.  Periodic evaluations are often flawed, because they appear to have no consequences or because their contents and methods are inadequate.  For example, a hand-picked senior warden is hardly an impartial evaluator; a stacked vestry is unhelpful; generalities avoid significant specifics; critical comments can be useless, if no motivation to change has been included!

 

Code of Silence

Observers have frequently encountered a code of silence among clergy (similar to what we hear about lawyers, doctors, educators, and the police), such that criticisms of colleagues are perceived as cheap shots, idle gossip, or indications of mean-spiritedness, envy, insensitivity, and/or disloyalty.  Also contributing to the reluctance to raise issues is the dread of instant diagnoses and categorizing, such as “triangulate,” “undermining,” “combative,” “passive-aggressive,” “hostile,” “authority problem,” “vindictive,” “confrontational,” “sick,” “not a team player,” and whatever else is in vogue at the time.  Though helpful when employed accurately, these labels – often used imprecisely and with incomplete information about their target - stifle collegial conversations and trivialize unfavorable com­ments.  If one is still at a pre-retired stage, the appearance of any of these classifications can significantly reduce the possibility of other calls and, in any case, damage one’s credibility.  [Regrettably, there are clergy who will knowingly lie about their critics (their motivations as well as the content and circumstances of the criticisms) in attempts to preserve their immunity.]  Genuine concern for the well-being of clergy and the Church requires attention to difficult matters with love and candor instead of silence.

 

 

C. SOME TYPES OF SCANDALS

 

Sexual

pedophilia: adults with children; prior to child’s puberty; heterosexual or homosexual

ephebophilia: adult erotic focus on adolescent youth between 13 and 17; heterosexual or homosexual

adultery: consensual sexual relations by a married person with other than his/her spouse; heterosexual or homosexual

            serial sexual encounters; heterosexual or homosexual

 

Financial

            embezzlement/theft

                        from church accounts

                        from gifts to church

            accepting sizable personal gifts from parishioners

 

Intellectual

            publicly abandoning the parameters of a church’s body of teachings

                        [as distinct from scholarly research]

 

Liturgical

            publicly officiating at (or participating in) rituals not approved by one’s church

selling” the sacraments and other rituals to anyone who comes along, without adequate preparation (baptisms, confirmations, burials, weddings, blessings of houses or objects)

insensitivity in hospitals and at funerals (meeting clergy rather than the bereaved persons’ needs)

 

Racism, Anti-Semitism

            participating in clubs and associations that exclude people of color, Jews, etc.

 

Other – Pastoral & Interpersonal

            treating subordinates (staff and volunteers) as dispensable “help”

            violating private or confidential communications

            public substance abuse

            public, habitual foul language

            lying; cover-up mistakes without remedying them